Membership
The Michigan Law Federalist Society finds innovative ways to serve the membership and grow our community! We aim to add value to our members, giving them the resources and support they need to develop intellectually, professionally, and socially.
As part of our careers and academic panels, we organized the first panel dedicated to a candid and enriching discussion on the challenges, triumphs, and strategies for balancing motherhood and a legal career. Our goal was to
Say the quiet part out loud
and dive into the experiences, issues, and questions that are often on the minds of women entering this profession but rarely spoken of.
Mothers At Law
FedSoc Clerkship Program
Over the past two years, Michigan's Federalist Society has significantly expanded its clerkship program to give students the knowledge and resources needed to navigate the clerkship application process. This expansion has included the development of comprehensive prep materials designed to help students who are applying and interviewing for clerkships.
One of the Chapter's key initiatives has been building new resources for interested students. These include a curated list of potential clerkship interview questions, a list of relevant cases and academic materials, and strategic guidance on approaching the application process. The Chapter has worked closely with Michigan's excellent clerkship director to help fully prepare students for the application and interview process.
Beyond offering informational support, the Chapter has also taken a hands-on role in helping students apply to clerkships. This effort includes assisting students in identifying judges and geographic regions that align with their career goals and reviewing student materials. Once a student receives an interview invite, the Chapter organizes rigorous moot interviews to help candidates prepare for the substantive questioning of a clerkship interview. These interviews often include current students, the Chapter's faculty advisor, and alumni.
Celebrating the chapter as a whole and each member individually…
Birthday Calendar & Treats
For our chapter, celebrations are a critical way for us to bond and grow as a community of legal scholars. To that end, we offer a unique way to celebrate one of the most significant events of any chapter member’s life: their birthday! More specifically, our chapter maintains a birthday calendar for its registered members to contribute to.
Upon opting in to the offering, members have the ability to fill out a Google Form that provides the Membership Development Committee with information about (1) the timing of their birthdays, (2) any favorite treats the members may like to have on their birthdays, and (3) what (if any) activities the members like to engage in on their birthdays. This information is then used to create digital birthday cards for each member (which are sent out to the larger membership on the specific member’s special day), and further enables the Membership Development Committee to secure special birthday treats for each member!
As our members graduate and become alumni, we keep this calendar to send them a Happy Birthday email and show them our chapter cherishes them, even beyond their days in Ann Arbor.
Director of Traditions, Treyton Zanutto, 3L
In addition to the Alumni Relations Chair, a position currently held by Zachary Breininger, we have created a new executive board position called the Director of Traditions. The goal of this position is to focus on 3L engagement and ensure a smooth transition between 3L and recent graduates. This Director also serves as a liaison between the Membership Development Committee (focused on recruitment, social events, and general membership support) and the Alumni Relations Committee (responsible for building relationships with our alumni). With this position, we aim to reduce the fall out that prevents student members from seeking and joining the Lawyers Chapters.
Creation of New Executive Board Position:
Director of Traditions
Publius Portraits @ Federalist Paper
Our weekly newsletter, The Federalist Paper, now features a new section called Publius Portraits. In this section, we feature our members in their lives outside the law school. We aim to allow our members to get to know each other beyond our names and labels, as well as celebrate different non-law milestones and accomplishments. Here are a few examples

















Free Headshots!
To generate and maintain goodwill with the broader law school community, our chapter offers free, high-quality headshots to all interested MLaw community members. We offered free headshots to over 80 law students. This is invariably our most successful outreach endeavor each semester! Not only do we help our new 1L Federalists look sharp on LinkedIn, but we also reach students who might not otherwise interact with our chapter.
New Means of
Engagement
-
To make our presence known on campus and to encourage participation amongst the incoming 1Ls our chapter hosted a “spirit week” during the first week of school. The first day was “Looking Sharp,” during which we encouraged them to dress well to make a good impression on their new professors and the 1L class. Next was “Celebrating Your True Colors,” where we had our members wear their undergraduate shirts to open up opportunities to engage with 1Ls from their respective undergraduate institutions. Third was “Go Blue!” during which our members wore their Michigan attire to demonstrate that we are part of the larger community.
On Thursday, we wore our Federalist Society merchandise to finally reveal to the 1Ls that they were talking to the enemy all week long… Just kidding, it was to promote our happy hour later that evening. Lastly, we wore red, white, and blue on Friday to celebrate our great nation, preceding the Labor Day holiday weekend.
-
To increase engagement with the wider law school student body and advertise our events to faculty, we host advertising events in the primary common areas of the law school. Typically, we set up two poster boards: one board shows a large-scale blow-up of our event poster, while the other has a poll or question for students to engage with as they pass by. As students come to fill out our poll, we take the opportunity to formally invite them to our events, and we encourage them to come. From this, we are able to engage with a group of students who may not respond to mass email blasts or bulletin board notices. As a bonus to this type of advertising, even students who do not engage directly with our tabling and did not fill out our polls are forced to see Federalist Society event details as they walk between their classes.
On Constitution Day, we celebrated by asking students to vote on their favorite and least favorite Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Students voted by placing a golden star or red sticker on each one. This sparked great conversations, partly because each person had a different criteria for determining what constituted the best or worse amendment. Great debate sparked, and the results (as demonstrated by stickers on that poster) were fascinating.
Most recently, we used this strategy to advertise our inaugural Judge Joan L. Larsen Speaker Series, featuring Judge Paul Matey and Professor Adrian Vermeule. Alongside a blow-up of the event information, we asked the community to mark their favorite piece of legal media. A Few Good Men and Better Call Saul were the favorites of the law school community. But more importantly than probing our classmates’ television preferences, our poll spread the word about the upcoming Larsen lecture and helped increase turnout for our flagship lecture series. As a result, more of our law school community was able to engage and wrestle with the ideas proposed by our panelists.
Even seemingly minor events such as table advertising have proven to be an influential part of our programming at Michigan Law. By advertising in-person in highly trafficked areas of our campus, our members are better able to encourage attendance at our events, and we are better able to answer any questions that our classmates might have about our programming efforts.
-
For the Michigan Law Federalist Society, the success of our members is one of our top priorities. To facilitate this goal, we match up every 1L with one or more upperclassmen mentors, using an algorithm focusing on similarities in factors like geographic interests, practice area, extracurriculars, religion, etc. Mentors meet with their mentees at least once per semester (although they are encouraged to meet more) to talk about firm applications, clerkships, classes, grades, and more. We try to subsidize at least one coffee or lunch for each mentor/mentee pair! The program has worked well to allow the 1Ls to get to know the upperclassmen, as the mentor can introduce the mentee to other members once they get to know each other.
-
To provide an opportunity for students, alumni, local lawyers and judges to get together and soak up Michigan’s unique game-day atmosphere, our chapter hosts tailgates before most home games. We have had judges come and bring their clerks, invited members from rival schools’ chapters, and even had lawyers from the area see our signs and stop by for some food and friendly debate.
As part of our weekly newsletter, we included a section called Arbitrary & Capricious Review, a weekly run-down of legal news inspired by IJ’s “Short Circuit.” The section provides a quick, punchy, and humorous list of recent legal developments. These are written and the content curated by our Speaker Committee Co-Chair, Steven Arthur. See examples:
BREAKING: Arbitrary & Capricious Review.
BREAKING: Arbitrary & Capricious Review.
-
There’s never been a better time to learn Latin. First, JD Vance invokes the “Ordo Amoris” (or the “Ordo Caritatis” for the Thomistically inclined). Now, Trump invokes (albeit in English) the venerable legal principle, “salus populi suprema lex.” Interesting times! I recommend picking up a copy of Wheelock’s Latin before the White House starts issuing Executive Orders entirely in Latin.
See here an interesting ongoing debate featuring Ilya Somin, Randy Barnett, and Ilan Wurman regarding Trump’s executive order denying birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants.
Interesting analysis from Eugene Volokh concerning the 1A issues raised by Trump’s denial of access to the AP after the news organization (famous for promptly updating their terminology!) refused to call North America’s venerable gulf, “The Gulf of America.”
What a difference a change in administration can make: in 2022, the USDA implemented a racial “equity action plan,” which provided, among other things, increased disaster relief funding to racial-minority farmers. But just a few days ago, Trump’s DOJ issued this notice in the litigation, stating that they “will no longer defend the merits of the [programs] to the extent they provide increased benefits based on race and sex.”
You can add this to the every-growing list of position-reversals in the second Trump administration’s first month.
A journalistic hagiography (from The Free Press) and a more cynical take (from Prof. Blackman) regarding the recent SDNY resignations.
-
New Acting SG (and former Williams & Connolly partner) Sarah Harris tells the Supreme Court: The federal government pleads Uno-reverse on, well, prettymucheverything filed before January 20, 2025.
SCOTUS picks up an establishment clause case! Here’s a great write-up from Prof. Blackman on the case.
Also, in case you didn’t catch it in the recent Advisory Opinions podcast, SCOTUS also granted cert on a fascinating free exercise case.
Trump’s executive order purporting to reverse birthright citizenship has been universally enjoined by a federal district judge in Seattle.
While many have pointed out the irony of this judge being a Reagan appointee, few have discussed his reputation for being rather liberal—especially when it comes to sentencing, say, Al-Qaeda terrorists.
I, for one, am curious to see if the defiance of this second Trump administration will—at long last—lead to the demise of the universal injunction.
If you’re interested in learning more about universal injunctions, I highly recommend these articles by Mila Sohoni and Sam Bray.
“If global warming is real, why is there ICE in Los Angeles?"
The rise of immigration raids in the first week of the second Trump administration brings to mind this fascinating article by Jud Campbell on the anti-commandeering doctrine.
-
Where will Trump be sued? A preview of the litigation in store for the second Trump presidency.
Filed today (1/20): A challenge to DOGE for allegedly violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act (but see this interesting OLC memo from one Antonin Scalia).
Pardonpalooza: Biden issues blanket preemptive pardons to his family, members of the January 6 committee, Anthony Fauci, and others. Josh Blackman writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about this fascinating new precedent.
TikTok FlipFlop: Trump once signed an executive order “effectively ban[ning]” TikTok; then Congress legislated a ban-or-sell bill, and Biden signed it; but as soon as the bill was upheld by SCOTUS and soon taking effect, Biden—with days left in office—said he wouldn’t enforce the ban; and now, Trump steps in at the final hour to save TikTok, promising the company that they can strike a deal. But… cool decision anyways, SCOTUS?
There are now 27 Amendments—and 1 Amendment in the Apocrypha.
DOGE makes its first efficiency cut.
Vape Docket watch: oral argument for the R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. case is this Tuesday! This one concerns a fascinating forum-shopping issue.
If you made it this far, you’re clearly a highly sophisticated consumer of legal news. Please enjoy: the case caption of the week.